首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Current Controlled Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine >Open reduction and internal fixation versus casting for highly comminuted and intra-articular fractures of the distal radius (ORCHID): protocol for a randomized clinical multi-center trial
【2h】

Open reduction and internal fixation versus casting for highly comminuted and intra-articular fractures of the distal radius (ORCHID): protocol for a randomized clinical multi-center trial

机译:reduction骨远端开放高度复位和关节内骨折(ORCHID)的切开复位内固定与铸造术:一项随机临床多中心试验方案

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundFractures of the distal radius represent the most common fracture in elderly patients, and often indicate the onset of symptomatic osteoporosis. A variety of treatment options is available, including closed reduction and plaster casting, K-wire-stabilization, external fixation and open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with volar locked plating. The latter is widely promoted by clinicians and hardware manufacturers. Closed reduction and cast stabilization for six weeks is a simple, convenient, and ubiquitously available intervention. In contrast, ORIF requires hospitalization, but allows for functional rehabilitation.Given the lack of randomized controlled trials, it remains unclear whether ORIF leads to better functional outcomes one year after injury than closed reduction and casting.
机译:背景radius骨远端骨折是老年患者中最常见的骨折,并且通常表明有症状的骨质疏松症的发作。提供多种治疗选择,包括闭合复位和石膏铸造,K线稳定,外部固定和开放复位和内固定(手掌锁定钢板)。后者由临床医生和硬件制造商广泛推广。密闭还原和铸件稳定六周是一种简单,方便且无所不在的干预措施。相比之下,ORIF需要住院治疗,但可以进行功能康复。鉴于缺乏随机对照试验,目前尚不清楚ORIF是否比闭合复位和石膏损伤后一年能导致更好的功能结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号