首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Clinical Medicine Insights. Pathology >Histopathologic Review of Previously Negative Prostatic Core Needle Biopsies Following a New Diagnosis of Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate by Core Needle Biopsies: Implications for Quality Assurance Programs
【2h】

Histopathologic Review of Previously Negative Prostatic Core Needle Biopsies Following a New Diagnosis of Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate by Core Needle Biopsies: Implications for Quality Assurance Programs

机译:新的前列腺穿刺活检对前列腺腺癌的诊断后先前阴性的前列腺穿刺活检的组织病理学评价:对质量保证计划的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Programs for quality assurance are increasingly important in surgical pathology. Many quality assurance (QA) techniques for surgical pathology were adopted from procedures introduced in cytopathology. Surgical pathology specimens have diminished in size such that the majority of diagnostic biopsies of prostatic lesions are now core needle biopsies. These specimens raise issues similar to those of cytology specimens, including concerns regarding adequacy and the representative nature of the biopsy. Due to sample size, some neoplasms may not be diagnosed on initial biopsy, raising concerns regarding false negative results. Cytopathologists have instituted QA procedures including review of all previously negative slides received within five years prior to the new diagnosis of high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion or gynecologic malignancy. No such requirement exists in surgical pathology for review of core biopsies.The Department of Pathology at the University of Utah instituted a QA policy requiring review of prior negative prostatic needle biopsies following a new diagnosis of prostatic adenocarcinoma. We reviewed five years of QA records of prostate needle biopsy review. During this time, nine hundred and fifty-eight core biopsy sets were performed. Two hundred and ninety-five of these contained at least one biopsy with a diagnosis of adenocarcinoma. Two hundred and eight patients had a prior set of prostatic needle biopsies with a diagnosis of adenocarcinoma. The remaining 87 had prior biopsies with either a diagnosis of prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (23), small atypical acinar proliferation (21) or no evidence of malignancy (43). QA review of these 87 cases revealed two biopsies which revealed foci of adenocarcinoma. Both had been initially diagnosed as no evidence of malignancy. The false negative rate for core biopsy was 0.68%. In an additional twenty-one cases, microscopic foci of atypical small acinar proliferations were found in core biopsies antedating the positive core biopsy (7.1%).
机译:质量保证计划在外科病理学中越来越重要。从细胞病理学引入的程序中采用了许多用于手术病理学的质量保证(QA)技术。手术病理标本的大小已缩小,因此,大多数前列腺病变的诊断活检已成为核心针头活检。这些标本引起的问题与细胞学标本类似,包括对活检的充分性和代表性的担忧。由于样本量大,在初次活检时可能无法诊断出某些肿瘤,引起了对假阴性结果的担忧。细胞病理学家已经制定了QA程序,包括对新诊断为高度鳞状上皮内病变或妇科恶性肿瘤之前五年内收到的所有先前阴性玻片进行检查。在手术病理学中没有这样的要求来复查核心活检。犹他大学病理学部制定了一项质量检查政策,要求在对前列腺腺癌进行新的诊断后复查先前的阴性前列腺穿刺活检。我们回顾了五年的前列腺穿刺活检质量检查记录。在此期间,进行了958例核心活检。其中的295例至少诊断为腺癌的活检一次。 208例患者事先进行了前列腺穿刺活检,诊断为腺癌。其余的87例曾接受活检,诊断为前列腺上皮内瘤变(23),非典型腺泡小增生(21)或无恶性证据(43)。对这87例病例的QA审查显示,有两次活检发现了腺癌灶。最初都被诊断为没有恶性肿瘤的证据。核心活检的假阴性率为0.68%。在另外的21例病例中,在活检前的核心活检中发现了非典型小腺泡增生的微观病灶(7.1%)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号