首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Clinical Interventions in Aging >Associations of frailty and psychosocial factors with autonomy in daily activities: a cross-sectional study in Italian community-dwelling older adults
【2h】

Associations of frailty and psychosocial factors with autonomy in daily activities: a cross-sectional study in Italian community-dwelling older adults

机译:日常活动中身体虚弱和社会心理因素与自主性的关系:对意大利社区居民老年人的横断面研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Frailty has been recognized as a risk factor for geriatric adverse events. Little is known of the role of psychosocial factors associated with frailty in explaining negative outcomes of aging. This study was aimed at 1) evaluating the differences in psychosocial factors among robust, prefrail, and frail individuals and 2) investigating whether there was any interaction effect of frailty status with empirically identified clusters of psychosocial factors on autonomy in the activities of daily living (ADLs). Two-hundred and ten older adults (age 73±6 years, 66% women) were involved in this study. Frailty was assessed using an adapted version of the frailty phenotype. The psychosocial factors investigated were depressive symptoms using the 20-item Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, social isolation using the Friendship Scale, and loneliness feeling using the eight-item UCLA Loneliness Scale. The autonomy in ADLs was measured with the Groningen Activity Restriction Scale. Thirty-one percent of participants were robust, 55% prefrail, and 14% frail. We performed an analysis of covariance which showed differences between robust, prefrail, and frail individuals for all the psychosocial variables: Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, F(2, 205)=18.48, P<0.001; Friendship Scale, F(2, 205)=4.59, P=0.011; UCLA Loneliness Scale, F(2, 205)=5.87, P=0.003, controlling for age and sex. Using the same covariates, the two-way analysis of covariance indicated an interaction effect of frailty with psychosocial factors in determining ADLs, F(4, 199)=3.53, P=0.008. This study demonstrates the close relationship between frailty and psychosocial factors, suggesting the need to take into account simultaneously physical and psychosocial components of human functioning.
机译:衰弱已被认为是老年人不良事件的危险因素。关于衰弱相关的社会心理因素在解释衰老的负面结果方面的作用鲜为人知。这项研究旨在1)评估健壮的,脆弱的和脆弱的个体之间的社会心理因素的差异,以及2)研究脆弱状态与根据经验确定的心理社会因素集群在日常生活活动中对自主性是否有相互作用的影响( ADL)。这项研究涉及了020名老年人(年龄73±6岁,女性占66%)。使用脆弱表型的改编版评估脆弱性。调查的社会心理因素是使用20个项目的流行病学研究中心抑郁量表的抑郁症状,使用友谊量表的社交隔离以及使用8个项目的UCLA孤独感量表的孤独感。用格罗宁根活动限制量表(Groningen Activity Restriction Scale)来衡量ADL中的自主性。 31%的参与者强壮,55%的身体虚弱和14%的身体虚弱。我们进行了协方差分析,结果显示健壮,虚弱和虚弱的个体在所有社会心理变量上的差异:流行病学研究中心抑郁量表,F(2,205)= 18.48,P <0.001;友谊量表,F(2,205)= 4.59,P = 0.011; UCLA孤独感量表,F(2,205)= 5.87,P = 0.003,控制年龄和性别。使用相同的协变量,对协方差的双向分析表明,脆弱性与社会心理因素在确定ADL中具有交互作用,F(4,199)= 3.53,P = 0.008。这项研究证明了脆弱与心理社会因素之间的密切关系,表明需要同时考虑人类功能的身体和心理社会因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号