首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>CBE Life Sciences Education >Implementation of Open Textbooks in Community and Technical College Biology Courses: The Good the Bad and the Data
【2h】

Implementation of Open Textbooks in Community and Technical College Biology Courses: The Good the Bad and the Data

机译:在社区和技术学院的生物学课程中实施开放式教科书:好的坏的和数据的

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

One challenge facing students today is high textbook costs, which pose a particularly difficult obstacle at community and technical colleges, where students typically have lower incomes and textbooks constitute a larger proportion of the overall cost of education. To address this, many advocate for using open-source textbooks, which are free in a digital format. However, concerns have been raised about the quality and efficacy of open textbooks. We investigated these concerns by collecting data from general biology classes at four community and technical colleges implementing traditionally published (non-open) and open textbooks. We compared student outcomes, textbook utilization methods, and perceptions of textbooks in these courses. In generalized linear statistical models, book type (open vs. non-open) did not significantly influence measured student outcomes. Additionally, survey results found that students and faculty perceived the open textbook as equal in quality to other textbooks. However, results also suggested that student textbook use did not always align with faculty expectations. For example, 30% of students reported reading their textbooks compared with 85% of faculty expecting students to read the textbook. Finally, faculty who implemented open textbooks expected the textbook to be used more often for reference and review compared with faculty who use traditional textbooks.
机译:当今学生面临的挑战之一是高昂的教科书成本,这对社区和技术学院而言尤其困难,因为那里的学生收入通常较低,而教科书却占总教育成本的较大比例。为了解决这个问题,许多人主张使用开放源代码的教科书,这些教科书以数字格式免费提供。但是,人们对公开课本的质量和功效提出了关注。我们通过收集实施传统出版(非公开)和公开教科书的四所社区和技术学院的普通生物学课程的数据来调查这些问题。在这些课程中,我们比较了学生的学习成果,教科书使用方法和对教科书的看法。在广义线性统计模型中,书本类型(开放式与非开放式)不会显着影响测得的学生成绩。此外,调查结果发现,学生和教职员工都认为开放教科书的质量与其他教科书相同。但是,结果还表明,学生教科书的使用并不总是符合教师的期望。例如,有30%的学生报告阅读了教科书,而有85%的教师希望学生阅读教科书。最后,与使用传统教科书的教师相比,实施开放式教科书的教师希望该教科书更多地用于参考和审查。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号