首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>CBE Life Sciences Education >Aligning Practice to Policies: Changing the Culture to Recognize and Reward Teaching at Research Universities
【2h】

Aligning Practice to Policies: Changing the Culture to Recognize and Reward Teaching at Research Universities

机译:使实践与政策保持一致:改变文化以认可和奖励研究型大学的教学

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Recent calls for improvement in undergraduate education within STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) disciplines are hampered by the methods used to evaluate teaching effectiveness. Faculty members at research universities are commonly assessed and promoted mainly on the basis of research success. To improve the quality of undergraduate teaching across all disciplines, not only STEM fields, requires creating an environment wherein continuous improvement of teaching is valued, assessed, and rewarded at various stages of a faculty member’s career. This requires consistent application of policies that reflect well-established best practices for evaluating teaching at the department, college, and university levels. Evidence shows most teaching evaluation practices do not reflect stated policies, even when the policies specifically espouse teaching as a value. Thus, alignment of practice to policy is a major barrier to establishing a culture in which teaching is valued. Situated in the context of current national efforts to improve undergraduate STEM education, including the Association of American Universities Undergraduate STEM Education Initiative, this essay discusses four guiding principles for aligning practice with stated priorities in formal policies: 1) enhancing the role of deans and chairs; 2) effectively using the hiring process; 3) improving communication; and 4) improving the understanding of teaching as a scholarly activity. In addition, three specific examples of efforts to improve the practice of evaluating teaching are presented as examples: 1) Three Bucket Model of merit review at the University of California, Irvine; (2) Evaluation of Teaching Rubric, University of Kansas; and (3) Teaching Quality Framework, University of Colorado, Boulder. These examples provide flexible criteria to holistically evaluate and improve the quality of teaching across the diverse institutions comprising modern higher education.
机译:用于评估STEM(科学,技术,工程和数学)学科的本科教育的最新要求受到了评估教学效果的方法的阻碍。研究型大学的教职人员通常是根据研究成功来评估和晋升的。为了提高所有学科的本科教学质量,不仅是STEM领域,还要求创造一个环境,在此环境中,在教师职业的各个阶段,对持续改进的教学进行评估,评估和奖励。这就要求始终如一地应用反映成熟的最佳实践的政策,以评估部门,学院和大学的教学水平。有证据表明,即使政策明确地将教学作为一种价值观,大多数教学评估实践也无法反映既定的政策。因此,将实践与政策保持一致是建立一种重视教学的文化的主要障碍。在当前国家为改善本科STEM教育所做的努力的背景下,包括美国大学本科生STEM教育倡议协会,本文讨论了使实践与正式政策中所述优先事项保持一致的四个指导原则:1)增强院长和教席的作用; 2)有效利用招聘流程; 3)改善沟通; 4)提高对教学作为一种学术活动的理解。此外,还列举了三个具体实例来改进评估教学的实践:1)加州大学欧文分校的三桶绩效评估模型; (2)堪萨斯大学教学专论评估; (3)科罗拉多大学博尔德分校的教学质量框架。这些示例提供了灵活的标准,可以全面评估和提高包括现代高等教育在内的各种机构之间的教学质量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号