首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>British Medical Journal >Effectiveness of neuraminidase inhibitors in treatment and prevention of influenza A and B: systematic review and meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials
【2h】

Effectiveness of neuraminidase inhibitors in treatment and prevention of influenza A and B: systematic review and meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials

机译:神经氨酸酶抑制剂在甲型和乙型流感的治疗和预防中的有效性:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Objective To review the clinical effectiveness of oseltamivir and zanamivir for the treatment and prevention of influenza A and B.>Design Systematic review and meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials.>Data sources Published studies were retrieved from electronic bibliographic databases; supplementary data were obtained from the manufacturers.>Selection of studies Randomised controlled, double blind trials that were published in English, had data available before 31 December 2001, evaluated treatment or prevention of naturally occurring influenza with zanamivir or oseltamivir (if given using the formulation and dosage licensed for clinical use), and reported at least one end point of relevance.>Review methods The main outcome measures were the median time to the alleviation of symptoms (for treatment trials) and number of flu episodes avoided (for prevention trials). Three population groups were defined: children aged 12 years and under; otherwise healthy individuals aged 12 to 65 years; and “high risk” individuals (those with certain chronic medical conditions or aged 65 years and older).>Results Seventeen treatment trials and seven prevention trials identified met the inclusion criteria. All trials included compared one of the drugs against placebo or standard care. Treatment of children, otherwise healthy individuals, and high risk populations with zanamivir reduced the median duration of symptoms in days respectively by 1.0 (95% confidence interval 0.5 to 1.5), 0.8 (0.3 to 1.3), and 0.9 (-0.1 to 1.9) for the intention to treat population. The corresponding results, in days, for oseltamivir were 0.9 (0.3 to 1.5), 0.9 (0.3 to 1.4), and 0.4 (-0.7 to 1.4). The effect of giving zanamivir and oseltamivir prophylactically resulted in a relative reduction of 70-90% in the odds of developing flu, depending on the strategy adopted and the population studied.>Conclusions Evidence from randomised controlled trials consistently supports the view that both oseltamivir and zanamivir are clinically effective for treating and preventing flu. However, evidence is limited for the treatment of certain populations and for all prevention strategies.
机译:>目的综述奥司他韦和扎那米韦在治疗和预防甲型和乙型流感中的临床疗效。>设计随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。>数据来源从电子书目数据库中检索已发表的研究; >研究选择:以英语发表的随机对照,双盲试验,具有2001年12月31日之前可用的数据,评估了用扎那米韦或奥司他韦治疗或预防自然发生的流感(如果使用经临床许可使用的制剂和剂量给予),并报告了至少一个相关终点。>审查方法主要的结局指标是缓解症状的中位时间(用于治疗试验) )和避免的流感发作次数(用于预防性试验)。定义了三个人群:12岁及以下的儿童;否则年龄在12至65岁之间的健康个体; >结果确定的十七项治疗试验和七项预防试验符合纳入标准。纳入的所有试验均将其中一种药物与安慰剂或标准护理进行了比较。用扎那米韦治疗儿童,否则为健康的个体和高危人群,则几天的症状中位数持续时间分别减少1.0(95%置信区间0.5到1.5),0.8(0.3到1.3)和0.9(-0.1到1.9)为了治疗人口。奥司他韦的相应结果(以天为单位)分别为0.9(0.3至1.5),0.9(0.3至1.4)和0.4(-0.7至1.4)。预防性给予扎那米韦和奥司他韦的效果可导致流感发生几率相对降低70-90%,这取决于所采用的策略和所研究的人群。>结论随机对照试验的证据一贯支持认为奥司他韦和扎那米韦在临床上均有效治疗和预防流感。但是,对于某些人群的治疗和所有预防策略的证据有限。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号