首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The British Journal of Venereal Diseases >The tampon test for trichomoniasis: a comparison between conventional methods and a polymerase chain reaction for Trichomonas vaginalis in women
【2h】

The tampon test for trichomoniasis: a comparison between conventional methods and a polymerase chain reaction for Trichomonas vaginalis in women

机译:滴虫试验:滴虫试验:传统方法与女性阴道毛滴虫聚合酶链反应的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

OBJECTIVES: Trichomonas vaginalis is the most common STD worldwide and the infection has been linked with an increased risk of HIV transmission. We present a detailed comparison between conventional collection and testing methods and the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tampon test for T vaginalis. METHODS: Women were tested for the presence of T vaginalis by PCR analysis of a tampon specimen and by conventional methods which included one or more of the following: culture and microscopy from a high vaginal swab (HVS) or endocervical swab (ECS), and microscopy of a Papanicolaou (Pap) smear. RESULTS: T vaginalis was detected in 51/590 (8.6%) conventional tests and 93/590 (15.8%) tampon specimens. Retesting of all tampon PCR positive specimens confirmed 89/93 (95.7%) tests. Using the tampon PCR as the reference, the sensitivities of the different conventional sampling and testing methods for the detection of T vaginalis were 8.3% (5/60) for ECS microscopy or culture, 31% (13/42) for HVS microscopy or culture, 52.8% (19/36) for HVS directly inoculated into Trichomonas medium and 59.4% (38/64) for Pap smear. CONCLUSIONS: No conventional test in the remote setting has comparable sensitivity to PCR. The Pap smear is the next most sensitive, but requires a speculum examination. The use of PCR will allow inclusion of T vaginalis into STD screening programmes in both developed (lower prevalence) and developing (higher prevalence) countries.


机译:目的:阴道毛滴虫是世界上最常见的性病,其感染与HIV传播的风险增加有关。我们提出了常规收集和测试方法与T阴道炎的聚合酶链反应(PCR)棉塞测试之间的详细比较。方法:通过对棉塞样本进行PCR分析并通过常规方法(包括以下一种或多种方法)对妇女的阴道T淋巴细胞进行检测:高阴道拭子(HVS)或宫颈内拭子(ECS)的培养和显微镜检查,以及帕氏涂片的显微镜检查。结果:在51/590(8.6%)的常规测试和93/590(15.8%)的卫生棉条样本中检测到了阴道炎。重新测试所有棉塞PCR阳性标本证实了89/93(95.7%)测试。使用卫生棉条PCR作为参考,对于ECS显微镜或培养,不同常规采样和测试方法检测T阴道炎的敏感性为8.3%(5/60),对于HVS显微镜或培养为31%(13/42)。直接接种滴虫的HVS感染率为52.8%(19/36),巴氏涂片为59.4%(38/64)。结论:在远程环境中,没有任何常规测试具有与PCR相当的灵敏度。子宫颈抹片检查是第二敏感的,但需要进行窥镜检查。在发达国家(患病率较低)和发展中国家(患病率较高)国家,PCR的使用将允许将T型阴道炎纳入性病筛查计划。


著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号