首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BioMed Research International >Safety and Efficacy of First-Line Treatments for Chemotherapy-Naive Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Indirect Comparison
【2h】

Safety and Efficacy of First-Line Treatments for Chemotherapy-Naive Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Indirect Comparison

机译:一线治疗未接受化疗的初治转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌的安全性和有效性:系统评价和间接比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Recently, several drugs have been introduced for the first-line treatment of chemotherapy-naive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), but few studies have compared treatment outcomes directly. This indirect comparison among 10 clinical trials (n = 4870 patients) retrieved from PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Collaboration, and ClinicalTrails.gov was performed to assess the safety and efficacy of docetaxel, cabazitaxel, abiraterone, enzalutamide, and sipuleucel-T for the initial treatment of mCRPC. No significant differences in primary outcome (overall survival) were found among initial treatments. However, docetaxel had the highest probability (37.53%) of being the most effective, but at the cost of more adverse events, while enzalutamide was associated with the best secondary outcomes (prostate-specific antigen response, progression-free survival, quality of life, and adverse event profile). Thus, docetaxel is recommended as the first agent used for the chemotherapy of mCRPC, while enzalutamide is recommended as the first nonchemotherapy treatment. Additional clinical trials are needed to confirm these findings and establish the optimal order for multidrug treatment of mCRPC.
机译:最近,已经引入了几种药物用于未进行化学疗法的转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌(mCRPC)的一线治疗,但是很少有研究直接比较治疗效果。从PubMed,Web of Science,Cochrane Collaboration和ClinicalTrails.gov检索的10项临床试验(n = 4870例患者)之间进行了这种间接比较,以评估多西他赛,cabazitaxel,阿比特龙,enzalutamide和sipuleucel-T的安全性和有效性。 mCRPC的初始处理。初始治疗之间未发现主要结局(总生存)有显着差异。然而,多西他赛最有效的可能性最高(37.53%),但以更多的不良事件为代价,而恩杂鲁胺则具有最佳的次要结局(前列腺特异性抗原反应,无进展生存期,生活质量)以及不良事件档案)。因此,多西他赛被推荐作为第一种用于mCRPC化疗的药物,而恩杂鲁胺被推荐作为第一种非化学疗法。需要其他临床试验来证实这些发现,并确定mCRPC多药治疗的最佳顺序。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号