首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The Behavior Analyst >The response—stimulus contingency and reinforcement learning as a context for considering two non-behavior-analytic views of contingency learning
【2h】

The response—stimulus contingency and reinforcement learning as a context for considering two non-behavior-analytic views of contingency learning

机译:响应-刺激性的偶然性和强化学习作为考虑两种非行为分析的偶然性学习观点的背景

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This paper introduces a special section on the contingency. Bower and Watson were invited to present their views of contingency learning in human infants from outside the context of behavior analysis, and Cigales, Marr, and Lattal and Shahan provided commentaries that point out some of the more interesting and controversial aspects of those views from a behavior-analytic perspective. The debate turns on how to conceptualize the response—stimulus contingency of operant learning. The present paper introduces the contingency concept and contingency detection by subjects, as well as research practices in behavior analysis, in a context in which the dependency between infant responding and the presentation of environmental consequences may be disrupted through procedures in which ordinarily consequent events occur before the response or in its absence. These points can relate to and serve as an introduction to the Bower and Watson papers on infant contingency learning as well as to the three commentaries that follow.
机译:本文介绍了有关偶然性的特殊部分。鲍尔(Bower)和沃森(Watson)被邀请从行为分析的背景之外,提出他们对人类婴儿的权变学习的观点。行为分析的观点。辩论围绕如何概念化响应(即操作学习的刺激偶然性)展开。本文介绍了偶然事件的概念和事件的偶然性检测,以及行为分析的研究实践,在这种情况下,婴儿反应和环境后果表现之间的依赖关系可能会通过通常在事件发生之前发生的程序来破坏响应或没有响应。这些要点可以与Bower和Watson有关婴儿意外事件学习的论文以及随后的三篇评论相关并作为其介绍。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号