首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Archives of Emergency Medicine >Treatment of knee sprains: modified Robert Jones or elastic support bandage?
【2h】

Treatment of knee sprains: modified Robert Jones or elastic support bandage?

机译:膝盖扭伤的治疗:改良的Robert Jones或弹性支撑绷带?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The aim of this investigation was to compare in a prospective randomized study the outcome of painful, traumatic knee injuries when treated with either the modified Robert Jones (MRJB) or elastic support bandage (ESB). Patients with moderate or severe unilateral knee injury presenting to our department within 24 h were randomized into two treatment groups receiving either the MRJB or an ESB. The main outcome parameters of the study were the amount of pain relief required, the speed of recovery, mobility and patient preference. The results of our study of 40 patients indicate that the two treatments were equally effective in treating knee sprains, and patients preferred the ESB in the early post-injury period. Therefore, we see no reason to continue using the MRJB for the treatment of sprained knees in the accident and emergency (A&E) setting when a more patient acceptable, time and cost-effective treatment is available.
机译:这项研究的目的是在一项前瞻性随机研究中比较用改良的罗伯·琼斯(MRJB)或弹性支撑绷带(ESB)治疗时膝关节疼痛性创伤的结果。在24小时内到我科就诊的中度或重度单侧膝关节损伤患者被随机分为接受MRJB或ESB的两个治疗组。该研究的主要结果参数是所需的疼痛缓解量,恢复速度,活动能力和患者偏爱。我们对40位患者的研究结果表明,两种治疗方法在治疗膝关节扭伤方面均有效,并且患者在受伤后的早期阶段更喜欢使用ESB。因此,我们认为没有理由继续使用MRJB在事故和紧急情况(A&E)情况下治疗扭伤的膝盖,只要有更多患者可以接受,更省时且更具成本效益的治疗方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号