...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research >Can a modified Robert Jones bandage after knee arthroplasty reduce blood loss? A prospective randomized controlled trial knee
【24h】

Can a modified Robert Jones bandage after knee arthroplasty reduce blood loss? A prospective randomized controlled trial knee

机译:膝关节置换术后改良的Robert Jones绷带可以减少失血吗?前瞻性随机对照试验膝

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: A bulky compression dressing (Robert Jones bandage) is commonly used after TKA to reduce blood loss, pain, and swelling. However, it is unclear whether these dressings in fact reduce blood loss. Questions/Purposes: We compared postoperative blood loss, pain, knee swelling, and postoperative complications in two types of postoperative dressings after TKA: a modified Robert Jones dressing (MRJB) and a conventional wound dressing. Methods: We conducted a prospective, randomized, controlled trial of 60 patients who underwent a unilateral primary TKA at our institution between November 2010 and July 2011. After wound closure, the patients were allocated into two groups. Thirty patients had the MRJB applied for 24 hours (Group 1) and 30 patients had a conventional wound dressing applied (Group 2). Postoperative hemorrhages in the vacuum drain, units of transfused blood, postoperative pain, knee swelling, and complications were assessed at 24 and 48 hours postoperatively. Results: We found no differences in the mean postoperative blood loss between the groups (Group 1, 418 mL versus Group 2, 467 mL). Blood transfusion amounts, postoperative pain, and knee swelling also were similar. Three patients in Group 1 experienced bruising and two patients in Group 2 also had bruising. One patient in Group 1 had a blister. Conclusions: Although previous studies have shown reduced blood loss, pain, and knee swelling after application of a MRJB, we found no benefit of this bandage. Our data suggest a postoperative compression dressing is not necessary after primary TKAs. Level of Evidence: Level I, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
机译:背景:TKA后通常使用笨重的加压敷料(罗伯特·琼斯绷带)以减少失血,疼痛和肿胀。然而,目前尚不清楚这些敷料是否能减少失血量。问题/目的:我们比较了TKA术后两种类型的术后敷料的术后失血,疼痛,膝盖肿胀和术后并发症:改良的Robert Jones敷料(MRJB)和常规伤口敷料。方法:我们在2010年11月至2011年7月间对60例行单侧原发性TKA的患者进行了一项前瞻性,随机对照试验。伤口闭合后,将患者分为两组。 30例患者应用MRJB 24小时(组1),30例患者使用常规伤口敷料(组2)。在术后24和48小时评估真空引流的术后出血,输血单位,术后疼痛,膝盖肿胀和并发症。结果:我们发现两组之间的平均术后失血没有差异(第1组为418 mL,第2组为467 mL)。输血量,术后疼痛和膝盖肿胀也相似。第一组的三名患者出现瘀伤,第二组的两名患者也出现瘀伤。第一组的一名患者出现水泡。结论:尽管以前的研究表明,应用MRJB后可减少失血,疼痛和膝盖肿胀,但我们发现这种绷带没有益处。我们的数据表明,原发性TKA术后无需进行加压敷料。证据级别:I级,治疗研究。有关证据水平的完整说明,请参见《作者指南》。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号