首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>APA Open Access >Direct Suppression as a Mechanism for Controlling Unpleasant Memories in Daily Life
【2h】

Direct Suppression as a Mechanism for Controlling Unpleasant Memories in Daily Life

机译:直接抑制作为控制日常生活中不愉快记忆的机制

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Suppressing unwanted memories can impair their later recall. Recent work shows that this forgetting is achieved by at least two mechanisms supported by distinct neural systems: thought substitution and direct suppression (). Here, we examined whether direct suppression, thought to be achieved by down-regulation of hippocampal activity, can disrupt memory of aversive scenes, and, if so, whether this disruption is linked to people’s perception of their ability to control intrusive thoughts. We presented participants with strong naturalistic reminders to aversive scenes and asked them to either covertly retrieve or directly suppress the associated scenes. Later, participants were cued with the reminders and asked to recall the scenes in detail. Direct suppression reduced recall probability of the scenes and also reduced the number of details recalled, even when scenes were remembered. Deficits in recall arose for minor details but also for details central to each scene’s gist. Participants with higher self-perceived control abilities over intrusive thoughts showed greater forgetting than did those reporting lower levels of control. These findings suggest that inhibitory processes underlying direct suppression can disrupt retention of aversive visual memories and link those processes to individual differences in control over intrusive thoughts in everyday life. These findings reinforce the possibility that inhibition may be less efficient in people likely to acquire posttraumatic stress disorder in the wake of a traumatic experience.
机译:抑制不想要的记忆可能会影响以后的记忆。最近的工作表明,这种遗忘是通过不同的神经系统支持的至少两种机制来实现的:思想替代和直接压制()。在这里,我们研究了通过抑制海马活动而实现的直接抑制是否会破坏对厌恶场面的记忆,如果是的话,这种破坏是否与人们对他们控制侵入性思维的​​能力的感知有关。我们向参与者提供了令人反感的强烈自然主义提醒,并要求他们隐蔽地检索或直接隐藏相关的场景。后来,参与者被提示提示,并被要求详细回忆场景。直接抑制降低了场景的召回概率,并且即使召回了场景,也减少了召回的细节数量。召回不足之处包括次要细节,也涉及每个场景要点的核心细节。自我控制能力强于干预思想的参与者比那些报告了较低控制水平的参与者更容易忘记。这些发现表明,直接抑制背后的抑制过程可以破坏厌恶视觉记忆的保留,并将这些过程与日常生活中对侵入性思维的​​控制上的个体差异联系起来。这些发现增强了在经历创伤经历后可能获得创伤后应激障碍的人群中抑制作用可能无效的可能性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号