最近引发热议的"非公益必要不干扰"原则,来源于百度诉奇虎360不正当竞争纠纷一案的判决,由北京高院石必胜法官提出.2015年2月,最高院驳回了奇虎360的再审请求,并认可了"非公益必要不干扰"原则.而学界对于该原则仍提出了反对意见.从互联网行业中竞争的现状出发,分析该领域中出现的各种不正当竞争行为以及法院审理过程中遇到的困境,并探讨近些年互联网领域中不正当竞争行为的发展态势.根据整理的规制互联网领域不正当竞争的规章以及行业自律公约,讨论由《反不正当竞争法》第2条衍生出来的"非公益必要不干扰"原则,明晰公共利益和竞争秩序原则多发的原因,希冀能够实现互联网领域竞争的良性和可持续发展.%The hot Principle of Non-Public Interest Need not Interfere is proposed by the Judge Shibisheng in Beijing High Court from Baidu V. Qihu 360 unfair competition dispute case. In February 2015, The Supreme Court dismissed 360's retrial requirement, and approved the principle. But some scholars raised ob-jections for the principle. Based on the current situation and dilemma in the competition of the internet, the author analyses several kinds of the unfair competition and the dilemma in trial process, and discusses the trend of unfair competition in the field of internet. According to the regulation of the unfair competition and self-discipline convention in the field of internet, the principle derived from Article 2 in Anti-unfair Competi-tion Law is discussed. Finally, the author tries to clarify the public interest and the reason why principle of competition order appears more in the competition, and hopes to realize the sustainable and benign develop-ment.
展开▼
