关于CDM项目考虑、决定和实施三个时间点(段)的识别——对联合国EB理事会拒绝和撤消中国CDM项目注册原因的研究和思考(5)

摘要

该文提出了EB理事会53次会议前中国CDM项目遭拒绝和撤消的重要原因之一,是DOE和项目参与者在考虑、决定和实施CDM的时间点(段)和提供相关证明以及表述和论证方面出现了问题。并以其咨询的中国某水电项目等为例,列举了DOE在审核过程中出现的种种问题,研究并指出问题产生的一般性原因和涉及EB制度建设与执行以及DOE利益机制方面的深层次因素,提出了对这些问题的正确识别和处理的方法和依据,并将其归纳为“两点一段”。最后建议中国DNA对涉及这些问题项目采取相应的调查行动,并将调查结果报告EB执行理事会;同时还对本文相关的难点问题进行了深入的探讨,提出相关意见和建议。This treatise points out that, before EB53 meeting, one of the fundamental reasons for registration of CDM project in China to be rejected and withdrawn by EB is the problem appearing in terms of the three points (period) of prior consideration, investment decision and start date understood and stated by DOE as well as relevant documents provided by pp. It takes a consulted hydropower plant in China as an example, lists various mistakes done by DOE in its validation process, studies and points out the common reasons for those mistakes and causes in depth related to construction of regulations for EB and implementation of it as well as conflict of interest for DOE, puts forward the methods and evidences to deal with these problems correctly, and sums up them as “two time points and one time period”. In the end, it recommends that China DNA should take an investment action on the projects involved in these problems and report to EB. Meanwhile it takes a further discussion on key points to this thesis and proposes views and relevant recommendations.