Objective To investigate the correlation between alcohol dependence patients of family violence and social support and coping style. Methods Using the domestic violence questionnaire, Trait Coping Style Questionnaire ( TCSQ) , social support rat-ing scale ( SSRS) to the Xinjiang mental health center, and drinking the people's Hospital of Xinjiang Autonomous Region Department of clinical psychology to investigating 138 patients accepted the dependence of wine research. Results Violence group (80 cases) of subjective hold points (25. 90 ± 3. 70), objective support (31. 39 ± 3. 25), supported the use of degrees(7. 40 ± 1. 67), social sup-port score (64. 73 ± 5. 046) and no violence group (58 cases) of subjective hold points (26. 81 ± 3. 62), objective support (31. 28 ± 3. 18), supported the use of degrees (7. 64 ± 1. 92) and social support score (65. 72 ± 5. 08) between support points of social factor:no significant difference (P>0. 05),Violence group (80 cases) to address (31. 94 ± 5. 64), negative coping (20. 39 ± 4. 31) and no violence group (58 cases) to address (33. 12 ± 6. 36), negative coping (19. 67 ± 4. 27) there was no statistically significant difference (P>0. 05). Conclusion Alcohol dependence Patientswith family violence and social support and copingstyles have no correlation.%目的：探讨酒依赖患者的家庭暴力行为与社会支持及应对方式的相关性。方法采用家庭暴力调查问卷、特质应对方式问卷( TCSQ)、社会支持评定量表( SSRS)对符合《中国精神障碍分类与诊断标准(第3版)》(CCMD-3)的新疆精神卫生中心戒酒科及新疆自治区人民医院临床心理科愿意接受研究的138例住院酒依赖患者进行调查。结果施暴组(n=80)的主观支持得分(25.90±3.70)、客观支持得分(31.39±3.25)、支持利用度得分(7.40±1.67)和社会支持总得分(64.73±5.04)与无施暴组(n=58)的主观支持得分(26.81±3.62)、客观支持得分(31.28±3.18)、支持利用度得分(7.64±1.92)和社会支持总得分(65.72±5.08)之间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。施暴组积极应对得分(31.94±5.64)、消极应对得分(20.39±4.31)与无施暴组积极应对得分(33.12±6.36)、消极应对得分(19.67±4.27)比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论酒依赖患者家庭暴力行为与其社会支持及应对方式无相关性。
展开▼
