Objective To observe the clinical efficacy of acupuncture plus Chinese medicinal fumigation in treating chronic pelvic inflammatory disease (CPID).Method Totally 120 CPID patients were randomized into group A, group B and group C, 40 cases in each group. Group A was intervened by acupuncture plus Chinese medicinal fumigation, group B was by dry acupuncture treatment, while group C was by Chinese medicinal fumigation alone. After 3 treatment courses, the clinical efficacies were observed, and the relapse rates among the cured cases in 8 months after the whole treatment were compared among the 3 groups.Result The total effective rate and recovery rate were respectively 95.0% and 70.0% in group A, versus 82.5% and 45.0% in group B, and 57.5% and 32.5% in group C, and the total effective rate and recovery rate in group A were significantly different from that in group B and group C (P<0.05). The treatment duration for the recovered cases in group A was significantly different from that in group B and C (P<0.05). The relapse rate in the recovered cases in the 8-month follow-up was 10.7% in group A, versus 44.4% in group B and 53.8% in group C, and the relapse rate in group A was markedly lower than that in group B and C (P<0.05).Conclusion Acupuncture plus Chinese medicinal fumigation is an effective method in treating CPID, and its advantages include content efficacy, short treatment duration, and low relapse rate, etc.%目的:观察针刺配合中药熏蒸治疗慢性盆腔炎的临床疗效。方法将120例慢性盆腔炎患者随机分为A组、B组和C组,每组40例。A组采用针刺配合中药熏蒸治疗,B组采用单纯针刺治疗,C组采用单纯中药熏蒸治疗。治疗3个疗程后,观察各组临床疗效,并比较3组痊愈患者治疗后8个月的复发率。结果 A组总有效率和痊愈率分别为95.0%和70.0%,B组分别为82.5%和45.0%,C组分别为57.5%和32.5%,A组总有效率和痊愈率与B组和C组比较,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。A组痊愈患者治疗疗程与B组和C组比较,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。A组痊愈患者治疗后8个月复发率为10.7%,B组为44.4%,C组为53.8%,A组复发率明显低于B组和C组(均P<0.05)。结论针刺配合中药熏蒸是一种治疗慢性盆腔炎的有效方法,具有疗效好、疗程短、复发率低等优点。
展开▼