Objective:Compared the value of long - term prognosis evaluation of different evaluation models in ST - segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)patients. Methods:There were 373 ST - segment elevation myocardial infarction patients in our hospital from January 2010 to December 2014,and conducted risk assessment on each patient respectively with TIMI score and GRACE score. Results:The two prognosis evaluation models had higher predic-tion value on high risk group. Besides,we found that both the prognosis evaluation models had fine correlation on prognosis evaluation of high risk patients. Conclusion:The two models are both of significance for countrymen’s long - term prognosis evaluation on STEMI.%目的:比较不同评估模型对急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)者长期预后评估的价值。方法:2010年1月~2014年12月本院所有急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者373例,每例患者都分别使用 TIMI 评分和 GRACE 评分进行风险评估。结果:两种预后评估模型对高危组预测价值更高。此外,我们发现两种模型对高危患者的预后评估具有良好的相关性。结论:两种模型对于国人 STEMI 的长期预后评估都有意义。
展开▼