...
首页> 外文期刊>The American Journal of Cardiology >Characteristics and outcomes of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction excluded from the harmonizing outcomes with revascularization and stents in acute myocardial infarction (horizons-ami) trial
【24h】

Characteristics and outcomes of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction excluded from the harmonizing outcomes with revascularization and stents in acute myocardial infarction (horizons-ami) trial

机译:在急性心肌梗死(horizo​​ns-ami)试验中,ST段抬高型心肌梗死的患者的特征和预后与血运重建和支架的预后不符

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Randomized controlled trials assessing new drugs and devices tend to exclude subjects who are at greatest risk. The Harmonizing Outcomes With Revascularization and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction (HORIZONS-AMI) trial incorporated broader inclusion criteria in an attempt to include a more representative spectrum of patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). To identify the differences between this modern trial and the real world, we analyzed the characteristics and outcomes of patients with STEMI who were screened but not enrolled at a high-volume recruiting center. Of 318 consecutive patients with STEMI who were screened, 200 (62.9%) were randomized, and 118 (37.1%) were excluded. The baseline characteristics and 30-day and 1-year clinical outcomes were compared in the 2 groups. The excluded patients had numerous high-risk features compared to those randomized, including being older (67.0 ?? 12.8 vs 63.0 ?? 11.4 years, p = 0.004), more often had had a previous MI (34.7% vs 8.0%, p <0.001), Killip class III-IV (27.4% vs 4.0%, p <0.001), and lower hemoglobin (13.4 ?? 2.3 vs 14.8 ?? 1.5 g/dl, p <0.001). The excluded patients had markedly greater 30-day and 1-year rates of all-cause mortality (17.4% vs 2.0%, p <0.001, and 27.6% vs 2.5%, p <0.001, respectively), major adverse cardiovascular events (death, MI, ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization, and stroke), major bleeding, and net adverse clinical events (major adverse cardiovascular events or major bleeding). On multivariate analysis, Killip class III-IV at presentation, age, left ventricular ejection fraction, and final Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction flow grade 3 were independent predictors of outcome. In conclusion, despite the broadened entry criteria of the HORIZONS-AMI trial, 37.1% of all patients presenting with STEMI at a center with a high rate of enrollment were judged to be ineligible and were excluded. The excluded patients had a significantly greater risk profile and markedly increased mortality and adverse events compared to the trial-eligible group. ? 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:评估新药和新器械的随机对照试验倾向于排除风险最大的受试者。急性心肌梗死与血运重建和支架的协调结果(HORIZONS-AMI)试验纳入了更广泛的纳入标准,试图纳入更具代表性的ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者。为了确定该现代试验与现实世界之间的差异,我们分析了筛查但未入选大量招募中心的STEMI患者的特征和结局。在连续筛查的318例STEMI患者中,有200例(62.9%)被随机分组​​,而118例(37.1%)被排除在外。比较两组的基线特征以及30天和1年的临床结果。与随机分组的患者相比,被排除的患者具有许多高危特征,包括年龄较大(67.0±12.8 vs 63.0±11.4岁,p = 0.004),以前有心梗的频率更高(34.7%vs 8.0%,p < 0.001),Killip III-IV级(27.4%vs 4.0%,p <0.001)和较低的血红蛋白(13.4±2.3 vs 14.8±1.5 g / dl,p <0.001)。被排除的患者在30天和1年内的全因死亡率显着更高(分别为17.4%vs 2.0%,p <0.001,和27.6%vs 2.5%,p <0.001),主要不良心血管事件(死亡) ,心梗,局部缺血导致的靶血管血运重建和中风),严重出血和净不良临床事件(严重不良心血管事件或严重出血)。在多变量分析中,Killip III-IV级,表现,年龄,左心室射血分数和最终的3型心肌梗塞溶栓是预后的独立预测因子。总之,尽管HORIZONS-AMI试验的入选标准扩大了,但在入组率较高的中心中,出现STEMI的所有患者中,仍有37.1%被判定为不合格,被排除在外。与有资格参加试验的组相比,被排除的患者具有明显更高的风险状况,并且死亡率和不良事件显着增加。 ? 2013 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号