Objective:To further study and discuss the clinical actual effect for labor pain relief method in the progress of improving the first-timer eutocia puerpera pain level to promote labor,so as to provide reference for related fields. Method:380 cases of first litters eutocia puerpera admitted in our hospital from January 2011 to December 2012 were chosen as the research object. They were randomly divided into the childbirth pain relief method group and the traditional delivery method group,and each group was of 190 cases of lying-in women. The traditional method of childbirth group was taken with the traditional way of delivery,and waited for natural delivery near the time of labor. The labor pain relief group was taken with childbirth pain relief. The situations of maternal vaginal delivery time and labor pain level in the two groups were compared. Result:(1)In the first labor time,the second labor time,the third labor time and the total labor time of the childbirth pain reduction group time of maternal group was significantly lower than the traditional childbirth puerpera(P<0.05);(2)The maternal pain childbirth pain relief method was superior to the traditional maternal childbirth group(P<0.05). Conclusion:In the process of clinical practice for the first-time labor,the implementation of eutocia puerpera childbirth pain reduction method can significantly improve maternal level of pain,and it also has important significance in promoting the development for the maternal labor.%目的：为了进一步研究和探讨在临床改善初产顺产产妇疼痛感级和促进产程进展过程中采用分娩减痛法的临床实际效果，从而为相关领域提供借鉴和参考。方法：选取2011年1月-2012年12月本院收治的初产顺产产妇380例为研究对象，随机分成分娩减痛法组和传统分娩法组，每组190例。传统分娩法组采取传统的分娩方式，临产后自然待产，分娩减痛法组采取分娩减痛法。观察比较两组产妇阴道分娩产程时间和疼痛等级情况。结果：（1）分娩减痛法组第一产程时间、第二产程时间、第三产程时间和总产程时间均显著低于传统分娩法组（P<0.05）；（2）分娩减痛法组产妇疼痛情况优于传统分娩法组产妇（P<0.05）。结论：在临床实践过程中针对初产顺产产妇实施分娩减痛法可以显著地改善产妇的疼痛程度，对于产妇产程进展过程也具有重要的促进意义。
展开▼
