不同采血方法在血常规相关检验中的应用价值

摘要

ObjectiveThe application value of different blood colection methods on blood related inspection in.Methods Colect 2015 years 4 months to April 2016 to the station of the blood routine examination of 100 patients, for al patients underwent venous and peripheral blood, venous blood sample data as a set of data, peripheral blood sample data as group B data, compare a, B group data of blood routine examination.Results Group A samples RBC, MCV, MCHC, PLT level significantly higher than in group B, there are significant differences, with statistical significance (P<0.01); HCT in group A samples, the detection level of MCH significantly higher than in group B, there was a significant difference, with statistical significance (P<0.05); group A samples WBC level was significantly lower than that of group B, there significant difference has statistical significance (P<0.01); patients in group A and group B blood the detection results of CV level and group B exist obvious difference, with statistical significance (P<0.05).Conclusion Venous sampling method has better stability and accuracy, can avoid the interference of various factors on the detection results of blood routine, with reference significance.%目的：探讨不同采血方法在血常规的相关检验中的应用价值。方法收集2015年4月至2016年4月医院进行血常规检查的100例患者，对所有患者均行静脉及末梢采血，静脉采血样本数据作为A组数据，末梢采血样本数据作为B组数据，比较A，B组血常规数据。结果 A组RBC，MCV，MCHC， PLT检测水平显著高于B组，差异有统计学意义（P<0.01）；A组HCT，MCH检测水平显著高于B组，差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）；A组WBC检测水平显著低于B组，差异有统计学意义（P<0.01）；A组血常规各项检测结果CV水平与B组差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论静脉采血方法具有比较好的稳定性及准确度，可避免各种因素对血常规检测结果的干扰，具有借鉴意义。