借书违约应从民法视角进行分析,是种合同行为,因图书丢失、损坏引起的违约应以采取补救措施、补偿损失为原则,适用惩罚性赔偿无法律依据。对超期借阅不适用赔偿损失这种责任制度,图书馆对超期者所收取的罚金既非赔偿损失、也非违约金,对长期借阅不还的读者可参照诉讼时效、合同解除制度予以解决。%The default of borrowing books is the contract act from civil law perspective. The default because of losing or damaging books should be to take remedial measures, compensate for the loss as the principle, the application of punitive damages have no legal basis. We should not apply the responsibility system of compensation for the overdue borrowing.The penal sum the library gathering to the overdue is not compensation for the loss, also not a penalty, for the readers of long-term borrowing and not returning we can refer to the limitation of action, the termination of the contract system to solve.
展开▼