《国有土地上房屋征收与补偿条例》第八条是“公共利益”实体范围在部门行政法的首次展开。比较其他国家或地区的立法模式发现：我国公共利益的实体范围的界定，采用了过于原则的“列举方式”，列举具体情形不够详尽；部分内涵和外延超越了公共利益的范畴，主要体现在“保障性安居工程建设”和“危旧房改追”的纳入方面；公益优先的立法精神，与物权法公私益平等保护原则相悖；行政权力行使与私权保护方面没有体现“比例原则”；在兜底条款中，将公共利益的解释权扩大到“行政法规”，与立法法相违背。%The eighth provision of Regulations on Expropriation and Compensation for Houses on State-owned Land interprets the scope of public interests entity, which is the first time in the Administrative Law. Compared with legislative modes in other countries or regions, the interpretation is improper and inadequate in the following aspects： 1 ） enumerated type is over-generalized, while cases lack details; 2） some connotation or denotation is beyond the scope of public interests, especially the inclusion of ＇ the construction of indemnificatory housing project for low-income urban residents＇ and ＇the alteration of old and dilapidated buildings＇ ; 3） the legisla- tive spirit of ＇ primacy of common interest＇ is not in accordance with the principle of equal protection to private and public interests in the Property Law; 4） the principle of proportionality is not applied to the exercise of administrative right and the protection of private right; 5） the right to interpret public interests expands to ＇ administrative laws and regulations＇ in the recapitulation, which is against the legislative law.
展开▼
