首页> 中文期刊>渭南师范学院学报 >论《史记》与《汉书》选录游侠形象的错位--兼谈太史公和班固的史学思想差异

论《史记》与《汉书》选录游侠形象的错位--兼谈太史公和班固的史学思想差异

     

摘要

太史公将道义之游侠视为正义力量的象征,是对国家正义缺位的一种补充。太史公期待一种异质力量的介入,去打破森严的封建统治秩序,来维护社会正义。游侠“以武犯禁”的特征,让其成为主流权力之外最佳的正义执行者。太史公从维护个体生命层面出发,强调游侠敢于犯禁,救人于困厄的侠义精神。班固从国家君主立场出发,有意混淆豪暴之侠与道义之侠,力在突出侠的暴力凶杀的特征,消解侠济危救困的品格,目的在于抑侠。%Sima Qian believed that the“paladin” was a symbol of justice and a kind of supplement? to the lack of national jus⁃tice. Sima Qian looked forward to a special external force burst the hierarchical system maintain social justice.The paladin’s charac⁃teristics of force let him become an executor of justice. In order to maintain individual life, Sima Qian stressed? paladin’ s force and the spirits of sacrifice themselves to protect others. In order to maintain the national order, Ban Gu intended to confuse the concept?between morality, justice and violence, and highlighted the violence? of paladin, and his aim is to restrain its development.

著录项

相似文献

  • 中文文献
  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号