评'司马迁生年前135年说'后继论者的'新证'

摘要

The age of Sima Qian suggested by the books Shi Ji Suo Yin and Shi Ji ZhengYi,as a hypothesis to be proved,cannot be used as the basic inference for Sima Qian's birth year.The later scholar's new evidences about Sima Qian's birth year in 135 B.C., in essence, are false and groundless because so-called scholars have undertaken a misunderstanding of the historical documents in search of evidences from the words with a circular reasoning.The argument that Sima Qian was born in 145 B.C.can be concluded temporarily.%《史记索隐》《史记正义》关于司马迁年龄的判断,皆为待证之假说,不能作为推导司马迁生年的基准点.司马迁生年前135年说后继论者的"新证",其实是误读史文,循环论证,在字缝中作考证,本质皆属伪证伪考.司马迁生于公元前145年可作阶段性定论.