2号指导案例“吴梅案”的当前解决逻辑是：二审和解协议由于未转化为法院调解书，不具备撤销一审判决的效力，因此在其不履行时，法院支持一审判决的执行。此逻辑实际上有违当事人意愿和诚实信用原则。该案解决的理想逻辑应是尊重“私权自治”的理念，借鉴法国民法典和民事诉讼法典的规定，确立和解协议在合同种类中的明确地位，特别赋予和解协议“消灭诉讼”的法律效力，使当事人合意构成对法院审判权的约束。%According to the current solution logic in the No.2 case,“Wu Mei case”,the settlement agreement does not have the effect of revocation of the judgement because it is not converted to the court mediation document. As a result,When the agreement is not carried out,the court will execute the judgement in the first instance. This logic is contrary to the wishes of the parties and the principle of good faith. In this case, the ideal logic should respect the autonomy of private rights,and establish the clear position of the settlement agreement among varies the contract types,just as the provisions of the French civil code and civil procedure code. In particular,the settlement agreement should be allowed to“eliminate the lawsuit”,so that the parties’ consensus is able to restrict the court’s judicial power.
展开▼
