服务型政府绩效评估的问题及其对策

摘要

绩效评估是推进政府工作的重要综合管理工具，是推进政府工作的内在要求，是提高政府工作的现实需要。政府工作评价好坏，不但需要民众的监督和自我改革与调整，更需要科学、合理的绩效评估，唯有此，才能推动服务型政府建设不断取得新进展。当前，部分地方政府开展绩效评估过程中，不能正确处理当前与长远，分不清轻重缓急，不能很好处理干好当前事与不唯GDP的关系。服务型政府绩效评估中存在主体单一、评估指标不科学、形式化严重、动力不足、轻视评估结果等问题，需要针对问题找对策。要建立服务型政府绩效评估多元化机制，完善服务型政府绩效评估指标体系构建，强化服务型政府绩效评估实施过程，构建服务型政府绩效评估的动力机制，加强服务型政府绩效评估结果运用的制度建设。要跳出惯性思维，用第三方的视角，从国家和未来长远发展的角度看问题，只有这样才能做到科学、理性的评估。%The performance evaluation is the important tool to promote comprehensive management of the work of the government, the inherent requirement to promote the work of the government and the reality need to improve the work of the government. The quality evaluation on the work of the government needs not only the public supervision and self reform and adjustment, but also more scientific, reasonable performance evaluation. Only in this way can people promote the construction of service-oriented government and continuously make new progress. Currently, in the performance assessment process of the local government, people cannot correctly handle the current and long-term relationship, distinguish the order of priority, and deal with correctly the relationship between GDP and good job. In the process of service oriented government assessment, there are the problems of single main body, unscientific evaluation index, serious formalization, lack of power and so on. Therefore, it is necessary to find countermeasures to solve the problem, establish complete service-oriented government performance evaluation mechanism, perfect the service oriented government performance evaluation index system construction, strengthen the service oriented government performance evaluation implementation process, construct the dynamic mechanism evaluation of service type government performance, and strengthen the use of service oriented government performance evaluation results. Relevant people should get out of the inertial thinking, consider the problem from the State's long-term development perspective and the third party's perspective, and achieve a scientific and rational assessment.