福建弋阳诸腔《白兔记》渊源考---以大腔戏、四平戏《白兔记》为例

摘要

明万历年间富春堂刊本<白兔记》是现存明刊<白兔记》的三大版本之一，属弋阳腔演出本，与福建现存弋阳诸腔<白兔记》之间有着很深的渊源。大腔戏<白兔记》和四平戏<白兔记》中有许多与明富本<白兔记》大致相同或相近的曲词，这说明它们之间有着同源关系；在大腔戏<白兔记》与四平戏<白兔记》中有一些大致相同或相近的曲词，而明富本<白兔记》中却没有，这表明除了明富本<白兔记》外，大腔戏<白兔记》与四平戏<白兔记》还可能受到其他版本<白兔记》的影响。这为福建弋阳腔系统<白兔记》渊源的考探提供了一些新的线索。%"BaiTuJi"of theFuChunTang version inthe Wanli period of the Ming Dynasty is one of the three versions exist-ing in Ming Dynasty"BaiTuJi", which is the Yiyang cavity performance. It has deep roots with the existing Fujian Yiyang tune "BaiTuJi". There are many same or similar words of song between DaQiangXi and SiPingXi "BaiTuJi",which shows that there is a homologous relationship between them. On the other hand, there are some same or similar words of song be-tween DaQiangXi and SiPingXi"BaiTuJi",which are not in"BaiTuJi"ofthe FuChunTang version.It suggests that DaQiangXi and SiPingXi "BaiTuJi"may get effect of other versions of "BaiTuJi"in addition to "BaiTuJi" of the FuChunTang version, which provides some new clues on the origin research of Fujian Yiyang tune"BaiTuJi".