为哈特最低限度内容自然法辩护——以自由主义中立性为视角

摘要

哈特为解决传统实证主义法学在法律效力上面临的困境，提出了最低限度内容自然法。他的这一理论遭到了很多非议，其中之一就是反对他把生存作为人类正常目的。然而，若把最低限度内容自然法置于自由主义中立性框架之下，这一理论便可以很好地回应批评。同时目的论式的自然法也会在新的话语背景下被抛弃。%Hart raised the theory of minimum content of natural law in purpose of solving the dilemma of legitimacy which the legal positivism faced. His theory is confronted with many challenges, one of which is opposed to treating survival as the proper end of hu man beings. However, it will satisfactorily respond to the criticisms if the minimum content of natural law is embedded in the back ground of liberal neutrality, whilst the teleological natural law will be abandoned.