首页> 中文期刊> 《数理医药学杂志》 >喉罩全麻与气管插管全麻在小儿麻醉中的应用效果观察

喉罩全麻与气管插管全麻在小儿麻醉中的应用效果观察

         

摘要

Objective:To compare the difference of LMA general anesthesia and endotracheal intubation general anesthesia in pediatric anesthesia.Methods:90 cases of patients who would receive elective surgery of general anesthesia in a hospital from January 2015 to December 2015 were selected and randomly divided into laryngeal mask group and endotracheal intubation group,with 45 cases in each group.Then compared the changes of HR,SBP,DBP,SpO 2 and the incidence of complications of two groups immediately after intuba-tion,at 3 min before extubation and immediately after extubation.Results:Immediately after intubation,the ascensional ranges of HR,SBP,DBP in laryngeal mask group were significantly lower than those of endotra-cheal intubation group (P <0.05 );At 3 min before extubation,the hemodynamics of two groups remained stable,with good ventilation.After extubation,the ventilatory function of laryngeal mask group was better than that of endotracheal intubation group (P <0.05).After extubation,there was no case of laryngeal spasm in both two groups,and there was no significant difference in the incidence of regurgitation,aspiration and gaseous distention of two groups (P >0.05 ).The throat discomfort rate of endotracheal intubation group (31.1%)was significantly higher than that of laryngeal mask group (P <0.05).Conclusion:The application of LMA general anesthesia for pediatric anesthesia has good safety,which can ensure the premise of maintaining effective ventilation to reduce the stimulation and keep a relatively stable hemodynamics,with less postopera-tive complications,and is better than endotracheal intubation general anesthesia.%目的::对比喉罩全麻与气管插管全麻在小儿麻醉中的应用效果差异。方法:选取2015年1月~2015年12月某院90例择期行全麻手术的患儿,随机分为喉罩组和气管插管组,每组45例,比较两组麻醉插管后即刻、拔管前3 min、拔管后即刻的心率(HR)、收缩压(SBP)、舒张压(DBP)、脉搏氧饱和度(SpO 2)变化情况及并发症发生率的差异。结果:插管后即刻,喉罩组 HR、SBP、DBP 上升幅度明显低于气管插管组(P <0.05);两组拔管前3min 血流动力学维持稳定,通气良好,拔管后,喉罩组通气功能优于气管插管组(P <0.05);拔管后两组患儿均无一例出现喉痉挛,喉罩组反流、误吸及胃胀气的发生率与气管插管组比较无统计学差异(P >0.05),气管插管组咽部不适的发生率为31.1%,明显高于喉罩组(P <0.05)。结论:喉罩全麻用于小儿麻醉中具有良好的安全性,可在确保维持有效通气的前提下减少刺激,维持血流动力学相对稳定,术后并发症少,优于气管插管全麻。

著录项

相似文献

  • 中文文献
  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号