By analyzing the status of the academic journal reviewing system and the problems springing out in the current experts-anonymously-reviewing system, this essay discusses on the common cognitive misunderstandings of the experts-anonymously-reviewing system,which still needs further improvement. It proposes that, in addition to highlighting the experts'subjectivity, we should strengthen the editor's leading role in the experts-anonymously-reviewing system.%分析了学术期刊审稿制度的现状,论述了当前学术期刊界普遍采用的专家匿名审稿制需要注意的问题,剖析了常见的专家匿名审稿制的认识误区,建议完善专家匿名审稿制度,在发挥专家的主体作用的同时,应大力加强责任编辑在专家匿名审稿制度中的主导作用.
展开▼