事后抢劫罪并非一个独立的罪名，而是经法律拟制为抢劫罪。司法解释关于已满14周岁不满16周岁的相对刑事责任年龄的人能否成立事后抢劫罪出现了不一致的规定，立足解释论的立场，“犯盗窃、诈骗、抢夺罪”被重新理解，故此承认相对刑事责任年龄的人是本罪的犯罪主体。事后抢劫罪与承继的共犯也是一个疑难问题，事后抢劫罪不是身份犯，后行为人成立共同正犯和共犯的想象竞合。但是，根据正犯优于共犯的法理，以故意伤害罪或者故意杀人罪的共同正犯论定刑事责任。最后，事后抢劫罪存在未遂，盗窃等前提行为相对于事后抢劫罪是一种潜在的实行行为，经由后续暴行、胁迫行为的实施，成为一种显在的实行行为。%Later robbery is not an independent accusation , but by legal fiction for robbery .Judicial interpreta-tion doesn't remain consistent in whether one above 14 but below 16 can be found guilty in later robbery .Based on the interpretation position ,"guilty of theft , fraud, snatch"has been given a new understanding , so that one above 14 but below 16 can be the subject of this crime .The relationship between later robbery and inherited complicity remains a difficult issue .Later robbery is not something concerning identity crime;the imaginative joiner of offenses about joint principal and complicity happens to the second offender .However, according to the jurisprudence that principal offender surpasses complicity , it is right to make a conviction of intentional homicide or intentional as-sault .Besides , later robbery exists an attempted form .By introducing the theory of Japanese scholar -professor Norio Takahashi , premise behavior such as theft is a potential implement behavior , and it will turn obvious after the implementation of later violent or coercive behaviors .
展开▼
