宫颈癌介入治疗中的临床护理路径对提高护理质量及患者满意度的价值

摘要

Objective To explore the value of clinical nursing path in the improvement of nursing quality and satisfactory degree of patients in the interventional treatment of patients with cervical cancer.Methods 60 cervical cancer patients with interventional therapy were selected and randomly divided into research group (clinical nursing path) and control group (conventional nursing),30 cases in each group.Nursing outcomes and satisfactory degree of patients were compared between two groups.Results Score of SDS in the research group and control group were (65.46 ± 4.58) and (64.73 ± 4.33) respectively (P ＞ 0.05) ; the number of patients without depression and with mild depression in the research group was significantly larger than that in the control group (P ＜0.05) ; score of SAS in the research group and control group were (66.13 ± 4.53) and (63.44 ±4.34) respectively (P ＞0.05); the number of patients without anxiety and with mild anxiety in the research group was significantly larger than that in the control group (P ＜ 0.05) ; time of lying in bed and hospitalization duration in the research group were less than that in the control group,while the incidence of complications,satisfactory degree and compliance of doctor's advice were better than the control group (P ＜ 0.05); accumulative survival rate in 5 years in the research group was 70.12％,which was significantly higher than 55.26％ in the control group (P＜ 0.05).Conclusion Clinical nursing path for cervical cancer patients with interventional therapy plays an important role in improving the nursing quality and satisfactory degree,it can not only shorten time of lying in bed and hospitalization duration,but also improve the survival rate and create better social benefit.%目的 分析探讨宫颈癌介入治疗中的临床护理路径对提高护理质量及患者满意度的价值.方法 选取接受介入治疗的宫颈癌患者60例并随机分为研究组(临床护理路径组)与对照组(常规护理组)各30例,观察2组护理结果及患者满意度.结果 入院后,研究组抑郁自评量表(SDS)评分为(65.46±4.58)分,对照组为(64.73±4.33)分,2组差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05);护理后,研究组中无抑郁和轻微至轻度抑郁的患者人数显著多于对照组(P＜0.05).入院后,研究组的焦虑自评量表(SAS)评分为(66.13±4.53)分,而对照组SAS评分为(63.44±4.34)分,2组差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05);护理后,研究组中无焦虑和轻微焦虑的患者人数显著多于对照组(P＜0.05).研究组患者的卧床时间和住院天数均少于对照组,且在并发症发生率、满意度及遵医行为方面均优于对照组(P＜0.05);研究组患者5年累计生存率为70.12％,显著优于对照组的55.26％(P＜0.05).结论 宫颈癌介入治疗中的临床护理路径对提高护理质量及患者满意度有重要影响,且能够缩短住院及卧床时间、提高生存率,为社会创造更好的效益.