工程总承包是目前国际上一种主流的工程发包方式，与之相匹配的标准化合同文本也应运而生。这些标准化合同文本总体上采用总价方式，这为发挥工程总承包的优势创造了条件，但同时也限制了工程总承包的广泛应用。本文介绍了FIDIC的“银皮书”，以及我国在2011年相继颁布的两个标准化工程总承包合同条件的特点和适用范围，并对其计价方式进行了分析，剖析了它们计价方式的收益或风险分配方式的特点以及适用范围，指出了在普遍推广应用中所面临的问题。特别的，为推动工程总承包合同条件计价方式的完善，提出了改进标准化合同条件计价方式的途径：构建介于单价合同与总价合同之间的计价方式，既保持总价合同对承包方激励作用，又充分发挥单价合同可对风险作合理分配的优势，以实现承发包双方的共赢。%Engineering general contract was one of these mainstream international engineering contracts. Besides, these standardized contarcts were arised at the same time and generally used lump-sum contract. Although this valuation method could take the advantage of engineering general contract, it might limit the application of the delivery method in a wider range. The paper introduced the silver leather book of FIDIC and characteristics, suitable areas and valuation method of these two standardization engineering general contracts promulgated by the Chinese government in 2011 were analyzed. Then characteristics of profit and risk distribution, as well as their scope of application were studied. These common problems in the popularization and application were pointed out. Especially, in order to promote the improvement of the engineering general contract condition, this research pointed out the way of improving the valuation method of standardized contract conditions. This research included that building one valuation method between the unit price contract and the total price contract. This valuation method not only could maintain motivation of total price contract to contractors, but also could make the advantage of the rational distribution of risk based on uint price contract. Obviously, achieving a two-goal win would be possible.
展开▼
