55例慢性荨麻疹患者SIgE与致敏原皮试的相关分析

摘要

目的 比较血清IgE(SIgE)与抗原皮试在慢性荨麻疹患者的临床应用价值.方法 在55例慢性荨麻疹患者,选取尘瞒(dust rnite)、苋(pigweed)、蟑螂(cockroach)、蛾(moth)、蚕丝(silk)、蜜蜂(bee),虾(shrimp)、蟹(crab)等8种常见致敏原进行皮试和血清SIgE的检测,比较两种方法的阳性率及尸值.结果 在8种致敏原中,皮试及sIgE的阳性符合率相近,其尸值均大于0.05,显示两种检测方法无显著性差异.结论 本研究说明,致敏原的皮内试验在过敏性疾病的诊疗中,是一种可靠的、值得推广的检测方法.%objective To compare the clinic value of serum specificity SIgE and anaphylactogens intradermal test in patients with chronic urticaria.Methods Eight kinds of anaphylactogens(dustmite、pigweed、cockroach、moth、silk、bee、shrimp、crab)were in tradermal tested in 55patients with chronic urticaria and the serum SIgE were detected in these patients,compare the positive rate of these twe methods and their P value.Results The positive rate of the intradermal test and serum SIgE were similar in these 8kinds of anaphylactogens,P>0.05,there is no significant difference between these two kinds of tetective ways.Conclusions anaphylactogens intradermal test is rel iable and worth to be spreaded.