首页> 中文期刊>国际眼科杂志 >飞秒激光微小切口角膜基质透镜切除术和飞秒激光LASIK近视治疗的双通道系统视觉质量评价

飞秒激光微小切口角膜基质透镜切除术和飞秒激光LASIK近视治疗的双通道系统视觉质量评价

     

摘要

AIM: To evaluate the visual quality between femtosecond laser small incision lenticule extraction ( SMILE ) and femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis ( LASIK) in the treatment of myopia. n METHODS:This study comprised 22 eyes (11 patients) underwent SMILE and 43 eyes ( 23 patients ) received LASIK with femtosecond laser to correct myopia and myopic astigmatism. The two groups were recorded bydouble-pass optical quality analysis system ( OQAS) at preoperative and postoperative 1mo. The two groups were compared: modulation transfer function cutoff frequency ( MTF cutoff ) , strehl ratio ( SR ) , objective scattering index ( OSI ) . The early visual quality after operation between two groups were analyzed and evaluated. n RESULTS: The MTF cutoff after operation one month were 34. 835±10. 113c/deg ( SMILE group) and 38. 362±10.623c/deg (LASIK group)(t=0. 925, P=0. 362). The SR after operation one month were 0. 204±0. 077 ( SMILE group) and 0. 218±0. 072 ( LASIK group) ( t=0. 557, P=0.582). The OSI after operation one month were 0. 608±0.291 (SMILE group) and 0. 545±0. 405 (LASIK group) (t=-0. 473, P=0. 640). n CONCLUSION:The double-pass OQAS tell us that there was not statistically significant between femtosecond laser SMILE and femtosecond LASIK in the treatment of myopia.%目的:评价飞秒激光微小切口角膜基质透镜切除术( small incision lenticule extraction,SMILE)和飞秒激光制瓣的准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术( laser in situ keratomileusis, LASIK)治疗近视术后的视觉质量。n  方法:选取11例22眼近视和近视散光患者为全飞秒组( SMILE组),同期23例43眼飞秒激光制瓣LASIK的近视和近视散光患者为飞秒激光制瓣的 LASIK 组( LASIK组)。使用双通道系统( OQAS )检查、记录两组患者术前及术后1 mo内的结果,对比二者的调制传递函数截止空间频率( modulation transfer function cutoff frequency, MTF cutoff)、斯特列尔比( strehl ratio,SR)和眼内客观散射指数( objective scattering index,OSI),分析并评价两种手术方式术后早期的视觉质量。n  结果:SMILE组和LASIK组术后1 mo时的MTF cutoff分别为34.835±10.113 c/deg 和38.362±10.623 c/deg ( t =0.925,P=0.362);SR 分别为0.204±0.077和0.218±0.072(t=0.557,P=0.582);OSI分别为0.608±0.291和0.545±0.405(t=-0.473,P=0.640)。n  结论:双通道客观视觉质量分析显示SMILE和飞秒激光LASIK两种术式对视觉质量的影响无明显差异。

著录项

  • 来源
    《国际眼科杂志》|2014年第11期|1971-1974|共4页
  • 作者单位

    830013 中国新疆维吾尔自治区乌鲁木齐市;

    解放军第474医院眼科医院屈光手术中心;

    830013 中国新疆维吾尔自治区乌鲁木齐市;

    解放军第474医院眼科医院屈光手术中心;

    830013 中国新疆维吾尔自治区乌鲁木齐市;

    解放军第474医院眼科医院屈光手术中心;

    830013 中国新疆维吾尔自治区乌鲁木齐市;

    解放军第474医院眼科医院屈光手术中心;

    830013 中国新疆维吾尔自治区乌鲁木齐市;

    解放军第474医院眼科医院屈光手术中心;

    830013 中国新疆维吾尔自治区乌鲁木齐市;

    解放军第474医院眼科医院屈光手术中心;

    830013 中国新疆维吾尔自治区乌鲁木齐市;

    解放军第474医院眼科医院屈光手术中心;

  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 chi
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    飞秒激光; 微小切口基质透镜切除术; 准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术; 近视; 视觉质量; 调制传递函数;

相似文献

  • 中文文献
  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号