运用文献资料法、比较法等方法,从跆拳道的技术体系、战术体系、裁判员执法三个方面对传统护具与电子护具进行比较研究。结果表明:技术体系中,传统护具比赛时基础腿法是主流。电子护具比赛时腿法呈多元化发展;战术体系中,传统护具以防守反击为主,主动进攻为辅。电子护具以攻防反一体化为发展趋势;裁判员方面,传统护具比赛时裁判员执法存在瑕疵。电子护具比赛时裁判员执法以科技引导比赛。%By analyzing documentary and comparison,from the tactical system,technical system and referee's judgment, this article compares traditional protective gear and Electronic Protective Gear of Tae Kwon Do. The results show:In the technical system,with traditional protective gear in a match,the basic leg techniques are most important. With electronic protective gear in a match, the leg techniques need to be diversified. In the tactical system,the traditional gear is given priority to with defensive counter-attack,and active attack is complementary. The trend of electronic protective gear is defense against integration. The aspects of referee,with traditional protective gear in a match,referee's judgment have flaws. With electronic protective gear in a match,referee's judgment guides match with science and technology.
展开▼