小骨窗开颅血肿清除术和大骨瓣开颅血肿清除术 治疗高血压脑出血的临床效果分析

摘要

Objective To study the analysis of small bone window craniotomy for removal of hematoma and big bone flap craniotomy hematoma removal of clinical curative effect for the treatment of hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage. Methods From April 2014 to February 2015 during receiving treatment of 104 cases of hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage patients as study object, the selected patients in hospital order can be divided into research group (n=52 cases) and control group (n=52 cases) and control group with large bone flap craniotomy hematoma removal treatment. Results The total curative effect compare two groups of patients with clinical treatment, the research group is significantly higher than the control group 84.62%, 94.23%, and the data, there exist certain differences statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion The clinical treatment of hypertension cerebral hemorrhage disease can be used for removal of small bone window craniotomy hematoma treated, the treatment can improve the clinical curative effect of patients, effectively reduce the clinical indicators, is of relatively great value in clinical application.%目的：探讨分析小骨窗开颅血肿清除术和大骨瓣开颅血肿清除术治疗高血压脑出血的临床疗效。方法选取我院2014年4月至2015年2月期间接收治疗的104例高血压脑出血患者作为研究分析对象，将所选患者按入院顺序分为研究组（n=52例）和对照组（n=52例），对照组采用大骨瓣开颅血肿清除术进行治疗，研究组采用小骨窗开路血肿清除术进行治疗，比较两组患者临床治疗状况。结果比较两组患者临床治疗总疗效，研究组94.23%明显高于对照组84.62%，且数据存在一定差异，具有统计学意义（P<0.05）。两组各指标比较，包含手术时间、输血量、住院时间等方面，研究组明显优于对照组，且数据存在一定差异，具有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论临床治疗高血压脑出血疾病可采用小骨窗开颅血肿清除术进行治疗，此治疗方式可提高患者临床治疗疗效，有效的降低各临床治疗指标，和大骨瓣开颅血肿清除术进行比较，前者明显具有一定优势，临床应用价值较大。