公司对外担保合同相对人审查义务的合理性质疑--以对我国《公司法》、《合同法》相关条文的规范分析为视角

摘要

If the legal representative of the company in violation of the company's articles of association in the name of the company and others to enter into any contract of guarantee,the validity of the contract? The relative foreign guarantee contract or obligation? If the guar-antee is the obligation,you should review what,according to the specific standard of review,breach of duty and when? Some scholars think,needs to maintain the interests of small shareholders,the requirements of the principle of capital maintenance and practice to prevent abuse of representative legal representative based on the right,should be considered relative to foreign guarantee contract obligation,but this view reasonable doubt.%如果公司法定代表人违反公司章程规定以公司名义与他人订立担保合同，该合同效力为何？公司对外担保合同的相对人是否负有审查义务？若是担保相对人有此项义务，那么应当审查什么，按照什么具体标准审查，违反义务又当如何？有学者认为，基于资本维持原则的要求和实务中维护中小股东利益、防止法定代表人滥用代表权的需要，应当认为公司对外担保合同的相对人负有审查义务，但此观点合理性存疑。