Objective To compare the curative effect between minimal invasive internal fixation with Mast Quadrant and tra -ditional open internal fixation for treating thoracolumbar fractures .Methods A total of 46 cases suffered thoracolumbar fractures were randomly divided into the minimally invasive group (MQ) and the traditional open group (TO) ,the patients in MQ group re-ceived minimally invasive pedicle internal fixation under Mast Quadrant minimal invasive channel ;the patients in TO group received pedicle internal fixation under traditional open channel .Perioperative related indicators ,imaging indicators and improvements of low back pain were recorded and statistically compared respectively .Results The different of the volume of blood loss ,operation time and length of incision and postoperative volume of drainage between the two groups were statistically significant (P < 0 .05) ,the different of the volume of hospital duration ,postoperative VAS score between the two groups were statistically significant (P <0 .05) .The different of the volume of flange height in injured vertebral fanterior ,Cobb Angle between preoperative and postopera-tive were statistically significant (P< 0 .05) .And comparison between groups had no statistical significance (P> 0 .05) .Conclusion Compared with traditional open operation ,minimally invasive pedicle internal fixation under Mast Quadrant minimal invasive chan-nel has the advantage of more simple operation ,less intraoperative bleeding and postoperative pain less invasive ,fast recovery and short hospitalization stay .%目的：比较 Mast Quadrant 微创通道微创椎弓根钉内固定与传统开放内固定治疗胸腰椎骨折的效果。方法46例胸腰椎骨折患者随机分为微创组和开放组，微创组采用 Mast Quadrant 微创通道下椎弓根钉内固定，开放组采用传统开放椎弓根钉内固定，比较两组患者围术期相关指标、影像学指标、腰背疼痛改善情况。结果两组病例在手术时间、切口长度、术中出血量、术后引流量等比较，差异有统计学意义（P＜0．05），住院天数及术后手术伤口疼痛视觉模拟评分法（VAS）评分等比较，差异有统计学意义（P＜0．05）；伤椎椎体前缘高度术前与术后影像学比较，差异有统计学意义（P＜0．05），后凸 Cobb 角术前与术后比较差异有统计学意义（P＜0．05），但组间比较差异无统计学意义（P＞0．05）。结论经 Mast Quadrant 微创通道下椎弓根内固定治疗胸腰椎骨折具有操作简单、术中出血少、术后疼痛轻、患者恢复快、住院时间短等优点。
展开▼
