首页> 中文期刊> 《中华耳科学杂志》 >老年听力障碍量表筛查版与完整版结果对比分析

老年听力障碍量表筛查版与完整版结果对比分析

         

摘要

Objective To compare the results between Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly (HHIE) and its screening version (HHIE-S) in elderly people over 70 years of age with hearing handicap. Methods One hundred and twenty people over 70 years participated in the survey using HHIE or HHIE-S respectively. Hearing function handicap scores from HHIE and HHIE-S were compared. Results HHIE scores identified 41 subjects with hearing function handicap (mild-to-mod-erate in 24 and maximum in 17). In comparison, HHIE-S identified 39 subjects with hearing function handicap (mild-to-mod-erate in 27 and maximum in 12). No significant difference was found between the results from HHIE and HHIE-S (X2=1.064, P=0.588). Conclusion HHIE-S can be used as a convenient screening tool in investigating hearing handicap in elderly peo-ple, with similar validity as HHIE.%目的:对比老年听力障碍量表完整版(HHIE)与筛查版(HHIE-S)调查问卷结果,探讨更便捷的功能性听力障碍筛检方法。方法对120例70岁以上老年人分别进行老年听力障碍量表HHIE和HHIE-S的问卷调查,对比各自听力障碍分级标准,分别得出听力障碍等级结论。将HHIE结果与HHIE-S结果进行比较。结果根据HHIE功能性听力障碍分级标准,完整版有41例存在听力障碍,其中轻中度24例,重度17例。HHIE-S结果显示39例存在听力障碍,其中轻中度27例,重度12例。HHIE和HHIE-S的功能性听力障碍分级结果无统计学差异(X2=1.064, P=0.588)。结论老年听力障碍量表筛查版(HHIE-S)可以代替完整版进行临床调查,更便于患者信息采集及临床应用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 中文文献
  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号