Objective To evaluate the power of two risk assessment tools in predicting deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in critically ill patients. Methods The DVT risks of totally 221 critically ill patients admitted in the intensive care unit (ICU) of West China Hospital, Sichuan University, between January and August 2016 were evaluated with Autar DVT Scale and Caprini DVT Scale, respectively. The predictive power of the two tools was statistically compared. Results The areas under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC-ROC) of Autar DVT Scale and Caprini DVT Scale in predicting DVT in the patients were 0.525 and 0.697, respectively (P＜0.05). There was also statistic difference between the two scales in predicting DVT in the inpatients in ICU (P＜ 0.05). Conclusions Both tools are useful and reliable in predicting DVT in the inpatients in ICU, but Caprini DVT Scale has a stronger predictive power.%目的 评价2种风险评估工具预测危重症患者发生深静脉血栓形成的效果.方法 分别用Autar DVT风险评估量表和Caprini DVT风险评估量表对2016年1—8月四川大学华西医院综合ICU收治的221例重症患者进行 DVT风险预测.统计比较2种评价工具的预测效果.结果 Autar DVT风险评估量表和Caprini DVT风险评估量表预测该组病例DVT形成的ROC曲线下面积分别为0.525、0.697,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05),预测ICU住院患者DVT形成可能性的差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05).结论 该2种工具在预测ICU住院患者DVT形成方面都可取、可信,但是Caprini DVT风险评估量表预测价值较好.
展开▼
