论《本草纲目》与《本草备要》版本体例之异同

摘要

《本草纲目》与《本草备要》均为明清时期极具代表性的本草类著作，二者在成书背景、版本系统、编撰体例等方面，既有相似之处，又各具特点。版本方面，《本草纲目》以“金陵本”“江西本”“合肥本”三大版本系统为主；《本草备要》则由原著者汪昂增订而成《增订本草备要》，并以此两者为母版，延伸出两大版本系统。体例方面，《本草纲目》论述详实，所列药物项目完备；《本草备要》由博返约，所列药物款目更偏重于实用。二书一繁一简，一全一便，一注重广博，一长在实用，既同且异。%Ben Cao Gang MuandBen Cao Bei Yaoare representative works of Chinese Materia Medica in the Ming and Qing Dynasties. There are similarities as well as unique characteristics in the version, style, compilation ideas and purposes of the two books. In the version aspect, “Jinling Version”, “Jiangxi Version” and “Hefei Version” are the three versions of the system ofBen Cao Gang Mu. Due to the revision and enlargement of the author (Wang Ang),Ben Cao Bei Yao developed intoSupplement of Ben Cao Bei Yao, Based on the two versions, two version systems were extended. In the style, detailed discussion and complete entry are the important characteristics of theBen Cao Gang Mu. Explaining profound theories in simple language and more emphasis on practical entry are the unique features of theBen Cao Bei Yao. There are similarities and difference between the two books.