布地奈德混悬液喷射雾化吸入对耳鼻咽喉科急性炎症患者的疗效评价

摘要

Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of Budesonide spray atomization inhalation on ear-nose-pharyngeal-throat acute inflammation.Methods 120 patients with ear-nose-pharyngeal-throat acute inflammation were slected from April 2010 to April 2013 in Liuzhou People’s Hospital.They were randomly divided into control group(n=60 )and observation group (n=60 ).The patients in observation group were treated with budesonide spray atomization inhalation,while the patients in control group were treated with conventional ultrasonic aerosol inhalation,continous use for 5 days.Compare the improvement of throat pain,pharyngeal foreign body sensation,dyspnea,hoarseness and the average improving time after treatment in two groups. Results The total effective rate of throat pain,pharyngeal foreign body sensation,dyspnea,hoarseness and the average improving time in observation group was significantly better than that in control group,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05 ).Conclusion Compared with conventional ultrasonic atomization inhalation,the efficacy of budesonide spray atomization inhalation on ear-nose-pharyngeal-throat acute inflammation is better.%目的：探讨布地奈德混悬液喷射雾化吸入治疗耳鼻喉科急性炎症患者的临床效果。方法选取柳州市人民医院2010年4月至2013年4月收治的耳鼻喉科急性炎症患者120例，按随机数字表分为对照组（n＝60）及治疗组（n＝60）。对照组给予常规超声雾化液，治疗组给予布地奈德混悬液喷射雾化吸入，2组连续使用5d。对比2组患者治疗后声音嘶哑、咽部疼痛、咽部异物感、呼吸困难状况改善情况及上述状况改善平均时间。结果治疗组咽部疼痛、咽部异物感、呼吸困难、声音嘶哑治疗总有效率和平均改善时间均优于对照组，2组比较差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论布地奈德混悬液喷射雾化吸入治疗耳鼻咽喉科急性炎症相对于常规超声雾化液吸入治疗，效果较好。