Objective :To evaluate the training efficiency of competitive sports in all provinces and autonomous regions of China ,and to provide references for decision‐making departments to de‐velop competitive sports business development strategy .Method :31 provinces of China were involved in the current research ,the CCR ,BCC and cross‐efficiency models of DEA were used to analyze the input and output of competitive sports in 31 provinces from 2010 to 2012 .Re‐sult :1) The average of global technical efficiency of the whole country is only 0 .547 ,reaching only six provinces DEA fully effective .The input ,efficiency and output of east part is higher than middle part ,and middle part is higher than west part ;2) The influencing factors of global technical efficiency of every province were different ,the average of pure technical efficiency (0 . 68 ) is smaller than the average of scale efficiency (0 .822 ) .The percentage of input redundancy and output inadequacy both are bigger than 30% ;3)The difference between the range of training effi‐ciency of competitive sports in Chinese provinces based on traditional DEA and based on the cross‐effi‐ciency is obvious .Conclusion :1)The training efficiency of competitive sports is generally low in China different zones ;2)The manage level of competitive sports resource is the major influence factor for training efficiency of competitive sports ;3)The range of training efficiency of competitive sports ,which is based on cross‐efficiency ,is more reasonable .%目的：评价我国各省、自治区、直辖市竞技体育事业训练效益，以期为决策部门制定竞技体育事业发展战略提供参考依据。方法：运用数据包络分析（Data Envelopment Analysis ， DEA ）方法的CCR、BCC和交叉效率模型对2010—2012年我国各省、自治区、直辖市竞技体育事业投入和产出进行分析。结果：1）全国综合效率均值为0．547，仅6个省、自治区、直辖市达到DEA有效，东、中、西部地区依次存在“较高投入、较高效率、较高产出”的局面；2）影响各省、自治区、直辖市综合效率的因素各不相同，各省、自治区、直辖市纯技术效率均值（0．68）小于规模效益均值（0．822），投入冗余率均值和产出不足率均值均高于30％；3）传统DEA方法与交叉效率分析对各省、自治区、直辖市竞技体育训练效益排名差异明显。结论：1）我国各省、自治区、直辖市竞技体育训练效益偏低，东、中、西部地区存在不均衡现象；2）资源管理水平是影响我国竞技体育整体训练效益的主要因素；3）交叉效率分析对各省、自治区、直辖市竞技体育训练效益排名更合理。
展开▼
