This study, mainly through the experimental method and mathematical statistics, makes corrective intervention programme for Chinese table tennis team and functional movement screen test. Control group and intervention group was divided through the implementation of a corrective intervention four weeks and six weeks after the retest, draw the following conclusions: 1) There was significant difference in test scores in the intervention group and intervention in the initial test and after four weeks(P=0.000); there was significant difference between the initial test and six weeks after intervention (P=0.000); four weeks and six weeks intervention test scores had no significant difference (P =1.000). 2) In the control group and four weeks after the initial test scores had no significant difference (P=0.488); there was no significant difference between the initial test and six weeks after intervention (P=1.000); after four weeks and six weeks after the test scores had no significant difference (P=1.000); 3) Four weeks and six weeks after the intervention, the number of people under the threshold of the experimental intervention group decreased from 35％ to 5％ and 0％ respectively. The control group did not change. Only 1 people changed during the four weeks to sixweeks; 4) After four weeks and six weeks of intervention, the number of asymmetric in the experimental intervention group was reduced from 11 to 2 and 1 respectively. The control group showed almost little change.%通过实验法和数理统计,针对中国乒乓球男、女国家二队运动员在功能性动作筛查测试中出现的问题做针对性纠正干预,分为实验组和控制组两个组别,通过对实验组施加为期4周和6周的干预纠正后重测得出以下结果:1)实验组别:初始测试和4周干预后得分有显著性差异(P=0.000);初始测试和6周干预后得分有显著性差异(P=0.000);4周干预后和6周干预后得分没有显著性差异(P=1.000).2)对照组别:初始测试和4周干预后得分没有显著性差异(P=0.488);初始测试和6周干预后得分没有显著性差异(P=1.000);4周干预后和6周干预后得分没有显著性差异(P=1.000).3)4周、6周干预后,实验组阈值以下人数由35％分别减少到5％、0％,对照组4周后测试没有发生变化,4～6周过程中只有1人发生了变化.4)4周、6周干预后,实验组不对称人数由初始11人分别减少到2人、1人.
展开▼
