股静脉置管两种缝合固定方法的比较

摘要

Objective: To compare the effects of two different butterfly suture and fixation methods for the femoral vein catheterization.Methods: A total of 300 patients with femoral vein catheterization were randomized into experimental group and control group. Unilateral suture was used to fix the catheter in the experimental group and bilateral suture used in (he control group.Results: For catheterization duration time and accidental removal rate, there was no significant difference (p>0.5) between two groups.Conclusion: Both methods can guarantee the safe therapy very well. Unilateral suture can provide a thorough sterilizing and decrease the pain in placement and removal of catheter, improve patients' quality of life and reduce the work of medical care personnel.%目的:对股静脉置管后采用两种不同缝合固定方法的效果比较.方法:将300例股静脉置管患者随机分为对照组和实验组,对照组采用两侧蝶翼缝合固定方法,实验组采用一侧蝶翼缝合固定方法.结果:两组患者导管留置时间和意外拔管率比较,差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05).讨论:两种固定方法均可保证患者的治疗顺利进行.一侧蝶翼缝合固定方法较两侧蝶翼缝合固定方法消毒时更彻底,且置管和拔管中均可减少患者的痛苦,提高患者的生活质量,同时减少医护人员的工作量.