传统疝修补术和无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝气的临床疗效比较

摘要

目的：探讨传统疝修补术与无张力疝修补术在腹股沟疝治疗中的效果。方法选取腹股沟疝气患者75例，分为对照组37例，观察组38例。对照组采用传统疝修补术治疗，观察组患者采用无张力疝修补术治疗。结果观察组患者手术时间、住院时间均低于对照组，且复发率和并发症发生率低于对照组（P<0.05）。结论无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝气治疗疗效优于传统疝修补术。%ObjectiveTo explore the traditional hernia repair and tension-free hernia repair in the treatment of inguinal hernia.Methods 75 patients with inguinal hernia were divided into a control group of 37 cases, 38 cases of observation group. The control group used traditional hernia repair treatment, the observation group were treated with tension-free hernia repair treatment.Results The operation time and hospital stay were lower than the control group, and the recurrence rate and complication rate were also (P< 0.05).Conclusion Compared with the traditional hernia repair, tension-free hernia repair is more effective than hernia repair.