目的：探讨不同手术方式治疗腹股沟疝的临床疗效。方法选取60例采用无张力疝气修补术治疗的腹股沟疝患者为观察组，选取同期采用传统疝气修复术治疗的腹股沟疝50例患者为对照组，比较两组的治疗效果。结果观察组的手术时间、术中出血量、术后止痛药使用率、切口甲级愈合率、住院时间均与对照组相比，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。观察组的术后并发与对照组相比有统计学意义（P ＜0.05）。结论无张力疝气修补术治疗腹股沟疝的疗效满意，患者术后恢复快，并发症少。%Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of different surgical methods in the treatment of inguinal hernia. Methods 60 cases with tension-free hernia repair in the treatment of inguinal hernia patients were the observation group, another 50 cases of inguinal hernia patients at the same period in the treatment of traditional hernia repair were the control group, and two groups were compared of therapeutic effect. Results The operation time, blood loss, postoperative pain medication use rate, a-grade recovery rate, length of stay in the observation group were statistically significant compared with the control group (P<0.05). The postoperative complication in the observation group was statistically significant compared with the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion The curative effect of tension-free hernia repair for inguinal hernia was with rapid postoperative recovery,less complications.
展开▼
