本文通过对《拼贴城市》和《建筑与乌托邦》的解读,对比了柯林·罗和塔夫里1对建筑与城市乌托邦的批判,进而分析了其不同的思想背景,并以福柯的异托邦概念解读他们对建筑与城市乌托邦问题的解决方案,指出其中自由主义的“拼贴”手法和马克思主义的面向社会现实的实践态度,对当代城市仍有重要的启示意义。%Based on the reading of Colage City and Architecture and Utopia, this paper compared Colin Rowe’s and Manfredo Tafuri’s utopia criticism, analyzed their diferent ideological backgrounds, interpreted their solution to architectural utopian with Foucault’s concept of heterotopias,pointed out that Rowe’s liberal bricolage and Tafuri’s Marxist practical atitude towards the social reality are significant to contemporary city.
展开▼