首页> 中文期刊>安徽医药 >阴道超声联合两种不同手术方式诊治剖宫产术后子宫切口憩室53例疗效分析

阴道超声联合两种不同手术方式诊治剖宫产术后子宫切口憩室53例疗效分析

     

摘要

Objective To investigate the feasibility and effectiveness of two operation methods combined with transvaginal ultrasonogra-phy treating previous cesarean scar defect(PCSD).Methods We selected 53 clinical data examples of PCSD patients and assigned them into group A(n =27)and group B(n =26).Group A underwent vaginal operation,while group B underwent hysteroscopic opera-tion.The clinical indexes and monitored treatment effects were compared between the two groups.Results There were two cases (3.8%)of complications.There were no significant differences in blood loss,hospital stay and anal exhaustion time between group A and B(P >0.05),yet there was significant difference in operation time between the two groups(P <0.05).As for efficacy evaluation, In group A,21 patients were cured and 5 patients became better.The effective rate was 96.30%(26 /27).In group B,15 patients were cured and 4 patients became better.The effective rate was 73.10% (19 /26).The total effective rate of both group A and B was 84.90%.Of all 53 cases the coincidence rate of vaginal ultrasound diagnosis of disease with surgical and potholgical diagnosis was 100%.Conclusions The two methods both can improve the symptoms of PCSD,however,transvaginal surgery is recommended as the preferred method.It is simple,safe and more effective,which is worthy of promotion.%目的:探讨阴道超声联合两种不同手术方式诊治剖宫产术后子宫切口憩室(PCSD)的可行性和有效性。方法选择PCSD 患者53例的临床资料,其中 A 组27例患者行经阴道手术,B 组26例患者采用宫腔镜手术,比较两组围手术期临床指标,随访治疗效果。结果53例患者手术有2例并发症发生,并发症发生率为3.8%;A 组术中出血量、住院时间、肛门排气时间与 B 组比较差异无统计学意义(P >0.05),A 组手术时间与 B 组比较差异有统计学意义(P <0.05);疗效评估:A 组治愈21例,好转5例,有效率96.30%(26/27);B 组治愈15例,好转4例,有效率73.10%(19/26),两组总有效率为84.90%。53例阴道超声诊断病例与手术及病理诊断符合率为100%。结论阴道超声可推荐作为 PCSD 首选诊断方法;两种手术方式均能一定程度改善 PCSD 的症状,但阴式手术效果更显著,是一种简单,安全,有效的治疗方法,值得推广使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 中文文献
  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号